Inclusive AI Interaction Framework for Enhancing Happiness and Care within Orange Technology Applications

Adam Faturahman; Hamdan Hamdan; Muhammad Faizal Fazri; Untung Rahardja; Adele Vallery

Authors

Adam Faturahman Hadirku Group https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9727-9092
Hamdan Hamdan Serang Raya University https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1169-3108
Muhammad Faizal Fazri University of Raharja https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9769-0257
Untung Rahardja Eduaward Incorporation https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2166-2412
Adele Vallery Ilearning Incorporation https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1433-1058

Keywords:

Inclusive AI Interaction, Perceived Empathy, Happiness and Well-Being, Artificial Intelligence, Accessibility Design

Abstract

This study introduces an Inclusive AI Interaction Framework designed to enhance happiness, emotional well-being, and compassionate digital care through the integration of emotion-aware algorithms, adaptive conversational models, and accessibility-centered interface design. The framework prioritizes inclusivity by addressing diverse user abilities, cultural backgrounds, and emotional states, ensuring that AI interactions remain fair, empathetic, and supportive for broad user groups, including vulnerable populations. The study aims to examine how personalized and affectively responsive AI interactions influence emotional comfort, perceived empathy, trust, satisfaction, emotional stability, and sustained engagement among diverse users. A quantitative research design was employed, using structured questionnaires, multimodal sentiment-based rating scales, and standardized World Health Organization WHO-5 well-being measures to evaluate user well-being. SEM was applied to validate the relationships among core constructs and assess the impact of inclusive AI design on affective outcomes. The analysis revealed significant positive effects of inclusively designed, emotion-sensitive AI systems on affective outcomes, including trust, satisfaction, emotional stability, and overall emotional comfort. The findings demonstrate that inclusively designed, emotion-sensitive AI systems can meaningfully elevate user well-being. This research provides empirically grounded design principles and practical insights for developing emotionally supportive, ethically aligned, and universally accessible AI solutions that contribute to more humane digital experiences.

References

[1] J.L. Singh, “Revolutionizing care: Developing an ai-human synergy mental health application for mental health worker’s well-being,” Ph.D. dissertation, Capella University, 2024.

[2] A. Simanjuntak, A. Sutarman, S. A. Anjani, and A. Nuche, “Integrating artificial intelligence in e-learning for organizational well-being through orange technology mapping,” IAIC Transactions on Sustainable Digital Innovation (ITSDI), vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 13–26, 2025.

[3] E. Coronado, N. Yamanobe, and G. Venture, “Nep: a human-centered framework for inclusive human machine interaction development,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 22, p. 9136, 2023.

[4] A. Anderson, J. N. Guevara, F. Moussaoui, T. Li, M. Vorvoreanu, and M. Burnett, “Measuring user experience inclusivity in human-ai interaction via five user problem-solving styles,” ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 1–90, 2024.

[5] H. Yadav and S. Maini, “The intersection of ai and emotions: Deep learning applications for a better society,” in International Handbook of Emotions: Resourceful Cultural Perspectives, Vol. 2. Springer, 2025, pp. 11–29.

[6] D. Y. Kristiyanto, H. D. Purnomo, G. P. Cesna, and N. Ani, “The strategic role of orange technology in cultivating innovation and well-being,” IAIC Transactions on Sustainable Digital Innovation (ITSDI), vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 27–37, 2025.

[7] P. Vasco, “A distributive framework of serious games engagement and innovation as key factors,” 2025.

[8] H. E. Riwayati, H. A. Rachman, S. Pramesworo, N. Yustisia, H. Umar, and M. Siahaan, “Unveiling the dynamics of financial literacy and inclusion in women digital loan decision making,” Aptisi Transactions on Technopreneurship (ATT), vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 986–998, 2025.

[9] C.-M. Wang and W.-C. Hsu, “Design of a gaze-controlled interactive art system for the elderly to enjoy life,” Sensors, vol. 24, no. 16, p. 5155, 2024.

[10] C. Halkiopoulos, E. Gkintoni, A. Aroutzidis, and H. Antonopoulou, “Advances in neuroimaging and deep learning for emotion detection: A systematic review of cognitive neuroscience and algorithmic innovations,” Diagnostics, vol. 15, no. 4, p. 456, 2025.

[11] D. Derlina, S. Zuhra, S. Mihardi, R. H. Lubis, J. T. Purba, and S. Stephanie, “Tpack based differentiated problem posing to enhance entrepreneurial digital problem solving,” Aptisi Transactions on Technopreneurship (ATT), vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 914–926, 2025.

[12] I. U. Rehman, D. Sobnath, M. M. Nasralla, M. Winnett, A. Anwar, W. Asif, and H. H. R. Sherazi, “Features of mobile apps for people with autism in a post covid-19 scenario: Current status and recommendations for apps using ai,” Diagnostics, vol. 11, no. 10, p. 1923, 2021.

[13] S. Pedell, K. Constantin, D. Munoz, and L. Sterling, “Designing meaningful, beneficial and positive human robot interactions with older adults for increased wellbeing during care activities,” in Handbook of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Vol 2: Practicalities and Prospects. Springer, 2021, pp. 85–108.

[14] A. I. Zulkarnain, N. A. Achsani, M. Siregar, and I. S. Beik, “Enhancing accountability in hajj fund governance through regulatory impact analysis and value chain model,” International Journal of Cyber and IT Service Management (IJCITSM), vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 198–213, 2025.

[15] M. Melyani, “Frame work of sensor in smart house using orange technology.” Journal of Technology Informatics and Engineering, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 09–21, 2023.

[16] I. Hipolito, K. Winkle, and M. Lie, “Enactive artificial intelligence: subverting gender norms in human robot interaction,” Frontiers in Neurorobotics, vol. 17, p. 1149303, 2023.

[17] M. Handoko, “Healthcare system for elderly people in indonesia,” Journal of Telematics and Informatics, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 12–21, 2021.

[18] C. Aurora and T. Mauritsius, “Creation of rag chatbot in answering queries related to banking terms using microsoft azure,” International Journal of Cyber and IT Service Management (IJCITSM), vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 144–155, 2025.

[19] Y.-K. Nguyen-Tran, A. Majiid, and R.-u.-h. Mian, “Data-driven spatial analysis: A multi-stage framework to enhance temporary event space attractiveness,” World, vol. 6, no. 2, p. 54, 2025.

[20] E. Rigley, A. Chapman, C. Evers, and W. McNeill, “Anthropocentrism and environmental wellbeing in ai ethics standards: A scoping review and discussion,” AI, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 844–874, 2023.

[21] Pramudita, “Komdigi passed the ai security ethics regulations,” INP Indonesian National Police Website, Nov 2024, accessed: 2026-02-24. [Online]. Available: https://inp.polri.go.id/artikel/komdigi-passed-the-ai-security-ethics-regulations

[22] E. Chen, J. Meng, and S. Dogan, “Towards a framework of ai-driven solution for neurodiverse learning: cognition, technologies and wellbeing,” Technologies and Wellbeing, 2024.

[23] U. A. Khan, Q. Xu, Y. Liu, A. Lagstedt, A. Alamaki, and J. Kauttonen, “Exploring contactless techniques in multimodal emotion recognition: insights into diverse applications, challenges, solutions, and prospects,” Multimedia Systems, vol. 30, no. 3, p. 115, 2024.

[24] M. R. Anwar and L. D. Sakti, “Integrating artificial intelligence and environmental science for sustainable urban planning,” IAIC Transactions on Sustainable Digital Innovation (ITSDI), vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 179–191, 2024.

[25] E. Ezra Tsur and O. Elkana, “Intelligent robotics in pediatric cooperative neurorehabilitation: a review,” Robotics, vol. 13, no. 3, p. 49, 2024.

[26] Y. Li, X. Ding, Y. Chen, Y. Li, and N. Ma, “Customizable ai for depression care: improving the user experience of large language model-driven chatbots,” in Proceedings of the 2025 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference, 2025, pp. 1844–1866.

[27] E. A. Nabila, S. Santoso, Y. Muhtadi, and B. Tjahjono, “Artificial intelligence robots and revolutionizing society in terms of technology, innovation, work and power,” IAIC Transactions on Sustainable Digital Innovation (ITSDI), vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 46–52, 2021.

[28] S. Elwahsh, N. Stern, A. Singh, and A. Ayobi, “Linguistic diversity and mental well-being: co-designing custom ai chatbots with multilingual mothers,” in Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Conversational User Interfaces, 2025, pp. 1–17.

[29] M. A. A. Qudah, L. Muradkhanli, and H. A. Weshah, “Hala hamdan, mutaz mohammed abuhashish. big data enables e-government to implement sustainable development,” International International Journal on Orange Technologies (IJOT), vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 40–52, 2024.

[30] I. P. Gustiah and H. Newell, “Enhancing human resource management efficiency through scalable blockchain networks with an adaptive ai approach,” Startupreneur Business Digital (SABDA Journal), vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 114–123, 2025.

[31] Y. Hew, D. Kutuk, T. Duzcu, Y. Ergun, and M. Basar, “Artificial intelligence in ivf laboratories: elevating outcomes through precision and efficiency,” Biology, vol. 13, no. 12, p. 988, 2024.

[32] M. Valizadeh and N. Parde, “The ai doctor is in: A survey of task-oriented dialogue systems for healthcare applications,” in Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), 2022, pp. 6638–6660.

[33] R. E. Indrajit, I. Gandhi, U. Rahardja, M. Sunengsih, and K. Moyo, “Beyond the algorithm: A review of user experiences and attitudes toward emotional wellbeing technologies,” Journal of Orange Technology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 11–18, 2024.

[34] I. I. Bittencourt, G. Chalco, J. Santos, S. Fernandes, J. Silva, N. Batista, C. Hutz, and S. Isotani, “Positive artificial intelligence in education (paied): A roadmap,” International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 732–792, 2024.

[35] A. Dudhat and E. Dolan, “Evaluation of ecopreneurship business sustainability in the context of the digital economy,” Startupreneur Business Digital (SABDA Journal), vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 64–72, 2025.

[36] R. C. Boone, “A case study exploring the responsible innovation in global fintech organizations incorporation of artificial intelligence,” Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana Institute of Technology, 2025.

[37] J. Bink, “Personalized response with generative ai: Improving customer interaction with zero-shot learning llm chatbots,” Ph.D. dissertation, Doctoral dissertation, Master Thesis Eindhoven University of Technology, 2024.

[38] W. Usino, M. M. Sari, F. P. Oganda, O. P. M. Daeli, and E. Smith, “Artificial intelligence integration for sustainable business model innovation insights from global startups,” Sundara Advanced Research on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 82–89, 2025.

[39] F. Pivi, M. Lombardi, R. Calegari, and E. Rimondi, “Integra: Inclusive technology for enhanced gradation and review of applicants,” in AAAI 2025 Workshop on AI Governance: Alignment, Morality, and Law.

[40] L. Turchet, “Entangled internet of musical things and people: A more-than-human design framework for networked musical ecosystems,” IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 355-367, 2024.

[41] P. H. P. Tan, S. Wijaya, U. Rahardja, B. N. Henry, and A. Anjani, “Modeling the impact of digital literacy on ai based learning adoption through perceived usefulness and easeof use,” Sundara Advanced Research on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 56–64, 2025.

[42] A. Costa, T. Julian, and M. A. Ferrario, “Assistive artificial intelligence for independent living: Opportunities and ethical challenges,” AI and Ethics, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 1121–1135, 2023.

[43] E. M. Bender, T. Gebru, A. McMillan-Major, and S. Shmitchell, “On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big?” Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pp. 610–623, 2021.

[44] B. A. Townsend, V. J. Hodge, H. Richardson, R. Calinescu, and T. Arvind, “Cautious optimism: public voices on medical ai and sociotechnical harm,” Frontiers in Digital Health, vol. 7, p. 1625747, 2025.

[45] A. Villamil and S. Heshmati, “Engaging in the good with technology: a framework for examining positive technology use,” Frontiers in psychology, vol. 14, p. 1175740, 2023.

[46] I. G. Cohen, T. Evgeniou, S. Gerke, and T. Minssen, “Ai and well-being: A systematic review of the literature on artificial intelligence and human flourishing,” AI and Ethics, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 453–471, 2022.

[47] N. Martelaro, Q. V. Liao, and R. Fok, “Inclusive design in human–ai interaction: Addressing bias and accessibility challenges,” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 1–35, 2022.

[48] R. A. Calvo and D. Peters, “Positive computing and ai: Designing digital systems for psychological wellbeing,” IEEE Pervasive Computing, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 18–27, 2023.

[49] A. Jobin, M. Ienca, and E. Vayena, “Global landscape of ai ethics guidelines and inclusive governance,” Nature Machine Intelligence, vol. 5, pp. 106–116, 2023.

[50] A. Abdul, J. Vermeulen, D. Wang, B. Y. Lim, and M. Kankanhalli, “Human-centered explainable ai for inclusive decision support systems,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 182, p. 103146, 2024.

[51] R. Y. Wong, D. K. Mulligan, and C. Koopman, “Accessible ai systems: Designing inclusive machine learning interfaces for diverse users,” Human–Computer Interaction, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 215–248, 2024.

[52] K. K. Fitzpatrick, A. Darcy, and M. Vierhile, “Delivering cognitive behavior therapy to young adults with symptoms of depression and anxiety using a fully automated conversational agent,” JMIR Mental Health, vol. 9, no. 2, p. e34512, 2022.

[53] G. C. Saha, S. Kumar, A. Kumar, H. Saha, T. Lakshmi, and N. Bhat, “Human-ai collaboration: Exploring interfaces for interactive machine learning,” Tuijin Jishu/Journal of Propulsion Technology, vol. 44, no. 2, p. 2023, 2023.